MOSCOW/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -
His face wracked by age and his voice rasping after decades of chain-smoking coarse tobacco, the former long-time Russian Minister of nuclear energy and veteran Soviet physicist Viktor Mikhailov knows just how to fix BP’s oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico.
“A nuclear explosion over the leak,” he says nonchalantly puffing a cigarette as he sits in a conference room at the Institute of Strategic Stability, where he is a director. “I don’t know what BP is waiting for, they are wasting their time. Only about 10 kilotons of nuclear explosion capacity and the problem is solved.”
For some, blasting the problem seems the most logical answer in the world. Mikhailov has had a distinguished career in the nuclear field, helping to close a Soviet Union program that used nuclear explosions to seal gas leaks. Ordinarily he’s an opponent of nuclear blasts, but he says an underwater explosion in the Gulf of Mexico would not be harmful and could cost no more than $10 million. That compares with the $2.35 billion BP has paid out in cleanup and compensation costs so far. “This option is worth the money,” he says.
[more...]
Related posts:
- Energy expert: Nuking oil leak ‘only thing we can do’
- Gulf of Mexico oil spill: BP fits cap on ruptured wellhead
- Nuke the Gulf Oil Gusher, Russians Suggest
- Special Report: Should BP nuke its leaking well?
- If It Is Time To Sell Gold Then Why Are Central Banks Hoarding Gold Like Crazy?
- Gulf Of Mexico Oil Leak Nightmare is Back – Oil Spewing out of BP Deep Water Horizon site – Flyover Video of it
Chinese
French
German
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Russian
Spanish